?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

"The Pact" by Jodi Picoult

Emily and Chris have known one another all their lives - literally (Chris, aged 3 months, was in the delivery room when Emily was born). They lived next door to one another and their two families did just about everything together, so no one was surprised or disappointed (just the opposite, in fact) when the two of them began dating as teenagers. Surely, they knew one another - and loved one another - as much as two people possibly could. So when Emily dies of a gunshot wound, and Chris was the only other person at the scene, both families are shattered. Chris says he and Emily agreed to a suicide pact, but how could two such well-adjusted teens feel a need to do something so horrible? Of course the alternative - that Chris murdered the girl he'd grown up loving - is even more horrible.

~The rest of this review contains MAJOR SPOILERS~

I've been reading a lot of Picoult lately, and really enjoying her books. I was somewhat disappointed in this one, though. Maybe disappointed isn't the right word. It was a great read - a page turner I finished in less than 24 hours. But, while the story should have been achingly sad (and it was sad), I found myself not as moved as I thought I should be. I really did like Chris, and felt certain from the start that he had not murdered Emily. Because of this, I felt that the "surprise ending" (as I'm pretty sure Chris' confession was meant to be) was anti-climactic (at least in terms of it being a surprise in and of itself). I'd felt from the start there was as much chance he'd pulled the trigger as she had. Still, the way the trial unfolded afterwards was interesting - although the book seemed to rush ahead from that point, which was strange to me, as the author had spent so much time meticulously setting the stage for it throughout the whole book. Maybe that's where I felt the real sense of anti-climax; not at what happened, but at the speed with which she ran through describing it.

As with Picoult's other books, she's created a bunch of great characters. (I wonder who the "Kate" in her life is; so far, every book I've read has a character with that name, IIRC). I particularly loved Gus, and Michael, and (as I already mentioned), Chris. James managed to come through in the end. I suppose the character who disappointed me the most was Melanie. I'd really expected something better from her. I understood - to a point - her rage and her unwillingness to come down from the tower of grief and anger that she built for herself. But somehow, when she figured out that Emily had, somehow, at sometime, been sexually abused (at least that's how I interpreted her running from the courtroom and vomiting), I expected something more to come of that. I suppose it was impossible for any of the survivors to know about the creepy man at McDonald's, if Emily really had never told anyone about it. But I was severely disappointed in Melanie for never coming forward with the contents of the diary (or maybe it's more of a loose end that I feel Picoult left untied).

I also found myself angry - very angry - with Emily, of all people. Long before Chris had the realization, I'd decided that Emily was surpremely selfish (and possibly unforgiveably unloving) in allowing Chris to have any part at all in her suicide. Even if she was severely depressed and unbalanced, it should have been obvious that having him there when she died would have possibly disastrous consequences for him. I suppose the whole point is that she'd found herself in a situation which completely surpassed her ability to cope, and what we saw in the book was the result. But still, it made me angry at her for a whole variety of reasons.

Mostly, though, the story was just sad. How can something look so beautiful on the outside, and be so thoroughly rotten on the inside? (Chris and Emily's relationship, and Emily's emotional life being the "something"). I wonder if Emily would have still had problems being sexually involved with Chris even if she hadn't experienced that brief sexual abuse. Maybe the situation really was psychologically incestuous, in some way. Putting Emily aside (since her troubles are, after all, over), it's hard for me to picture Chris having anything resembling a happy life, in spite of the aquittal. Well, maybe eventually, but how could a complete life be devastated in this way without having lasting consequences? So, I finished the book feeling depressed, rather than uplifted, in spite of the "happy" outcome of the trial. Still, as I mentioned at the start, I felt that the book didn't really have as deep of an impact on me as I felt it could have, if a few things had been different.

Still, a fascinating read, and definitely worth the time spent reading it. 7.5 stars/10

Tags:

Comments

( 3 comments — Leave a comment )
beckerbuns
Mar. 18th, 2007 03:58 pm (UTC)
I really enjoyed this book, and it's one of my favorites of Picoult's, actually. But I had some of the same problems with it that you had, actually. It's also kind of annoying that the majority of her books turn from emotional, compelling stories into courtroom dramas.
beckerbuns
Mar. 18th, 2007 04:00 pm (UTC)
And I seem to say "actually" a lot... Actually...
here_be_dragons
Mar. 19th, 2007 06:40 am (UTC)
I know what you mean about the courtroom drama thing. I mean, I start the books knowing that's what will happen (since all the ones I've read so far did end up in a courtroom), but usually somewhere early in the book, I forget, and think it's just going to keep going along as it is. But then, BANG! We've got lawyers. It's starting out with Anita Shreve, and ending up with John Grisham. :D And in a way, I don't mind . . . I love legal thrillers, too, or at least I used to read a lot of them. But there is something almost spoilerish about realizing, "Oh! This thing is going to end up in court, which means someone's getting arrested soon." :D
( 3 comments — Leave a comment )
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Teresa Jones