Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

"Pinocchio," by Carlo Collodi

It's our turn to host the homeschool book club this week, and "Pinocchio" is the book my son and I chose, since it's a classic, but neither of us had ever read it. I bought a copy of this book a few years ago, when I was traveling in Florence (where the book takes place); I thought it would be a good souvenier. (My edition is in English, even though I bought it in Italy).

For me (and for most Americans, certainly), Disney's version is the one I grew up with. What a surprise to read this book and discover that the two stories share only a few similarities. There is a film version which does a better job of sticking to the original story - the fairly recent film by Roberto Benigni (unfortunately, that film is pretty awful, IMO). Since the Disney film is such a part of my childhood, most of this review has taken the form of a comparison between the film and the book. (I didn't intend for this to happen, but that's the way it came out as I was writing it).

Many of Pinocchio's adventures are familiar, or at least somewhat recognizable, from the Disney version: running away from school to join the theatre; being duped by the Fox and the Cat; the journey to Pleasure Island/Playland; ending up in the stomach of a shark or whale. There is a cricket and a fairy, although both are significantly altered. And yes, his nose does grow when he tells lies, at least some of the time. This is where the similarity between the two ends.

Pinocchio isn't at all the innocent, trusting, charming little puppet given to us by Disney. He starts out a selfish, lying, cruel and misbehaving brat, although by the end of the story, he does finally learn how to behave like a decent person (even if it takes a LOT of lessons to get him to this point). Gepetto is also not the kindly old man we see in the cartoon, and the Blue Fairy, while still filling essentially the same role as protector and saviour, is much more interesting in the book. (She goes through many changes; starting out as a child, fufilling the role of a sister for Pinocchio, and later growing older, becoming a mother to him).

On the whole, it seems clear that this story was meant as a morality lesson for children: bad things happen to naughty children; children who listen to their parents and tell the truth will be happy. These sentiments (and others: don't associate with evil companions; go to school; work hard) are repeated over and over . . . and over, to the point where I found them very repetitive. However, when put in the context of the original story - which was serialized in a magazine, IIRC - it makes more sense. I will admit to encouraging my son to pay attention (we read the book together), as the overall message was worthwhile.

I am glad to have finally read this. I'm always interested in the way books are translated into film or other media, and "Pinocchio" is an interesting story, filled with fantasy elements like talking animals and magic. It's a fun story, and it is gratifying to see Pinocchio's transformation, bit by bit. Plus, as a classic, it's one of those books I feel that I "should" have read years ago. While it did get repetitive, and wasn't entirely charming, I still found it well worthwhile.



( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
Mar. 28th, 2007 03:00 am (UTC)
That's actually very interesting. I'm like you - I'm into how books translate over to other media, and I've never really given Pinnochio a second thought. I don't even know if I was consciously aware what form the story first took. Maybe I'll pick it up and read it in the bookstore next time I'm there.

My childhood love was Peter Pan. I'm guessing/hoping you've read the original Peter Pan? I was so happy with the 2003 live-action film of it. It stayed so faithful to the original. I cried.

Oh, and Huck Finn. I loved The Adventures Of Huckleberry Finn. Would love to see a great film adaptation of that.

Mar. 28th, 2007 03:05 am (UTC)
I was going to mention Peter Pan, too. I read it in HS - so different! Good, but very different.
Mar. 28th, 2007 03:14 am (UTC)
Peter Pan isn't a favorite of mine, but it's mostly for personal reasons (see my longer comment to elite if you want to know more about those reasons). :)
Mar. 28th, 2007 03:12 am (UTC)
I'm not sure when I realized that "Pinocchio" was a book first, and not a film. Certainly as a child, all I knew about was the Disney story. Something I find interesting is that, here in the U.S., I would say that the Disney film IS Pinocchio for most of us, whereas in Italy, the original book is apparently a really big part of their folk culture.

I have read "Peter Pan," although I only read it a few years ago. That one, I always knew it was a book, but avoided it for personal reasons. I was named for Wendy Darling, and never really appreciated the fact (because she's such a priss in the Disney film). So, PP has never really been a favorite of mine - just because of that. Looking at it objectively, I do like the basics of the story, although to be honest, I didn't really enjoy the book. (If you want to see my review, it's here: http://www.librarything.com/review/578628 ). Now that I think about it, I probably would have loved it when I was a kid - the stuff that bothered me about it is more "adult" stuff. Too bad I never did read it back then. :(

I really did enjoy the 2003 film, though. Plus, like you, I almost always appreciate when filmmakers stick to the original story as closely as possible. I can think of a very few exceptions when the film made changes I thought were an improvement. (And oh crap, just the other day I watched a film that fell in this category, and now I can't remember what it was. ARGH! If I remember, I'll make another comment). Usually, though, I hate when they change books, especially if it's a book I really loved.

Huck Finn I've never read. I read the Cliff's Notes in high school; I was rebelling against the fact that I DID read "The Sun Also Rises" and was so traumatized (OMG THAT BOOK SUCKS), I swore I wouldn't read any more of the "literature" the school was trying to force me to read. I realize now this was cutting off my nose to spite my face, but it seemed like a good idea at the time. I should put HF on my "to read" list - I bet I would enjoy it now. :)
( 4 comments — Leave a comment )
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Teresa Jones